The webinar included an unsettling slide called the FY2012 pipeline(i.e., cases in the EPA enforcement process)

1) There are a large number of cases that are expected to be filed/settled

2) These cases are being pushed through is a priority

These cases include both large and small firms and certified and non-certified firms
So there you have it. The EPA is coming and it seems that 400 tips per month are being reported.

Related posts

• No related posts.

What if the Republicans win the senate next election and the rolls are switched. If you keep up with the EPA RRP politics, you know that a group of senators lead by Republican Senator Inhofe have been frequent critics of the EPA’s RRP Rule. Oversight hearings have been called for on the EPA’s Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting regulations. Since March 26, 2010 through July 15, 2011, there have been many different news releases by the Republican Minority criticizing the EPA’s implementation of the RRP Rule.

With all the communications between Republican Senators and the EPA’s mishandling of the Lead Based Paint Rule, one would think that when the Republicans are in charge they will simple do away with the Renovation, Repair, and Painting rule altogether.

But, what politician can face the criticism from all the anti-lead organizations that support protecting pregnant women and children from exposure to lead? With this worthwhile objective in mind, the real answer is “No Senator or Representative” will stand against this cause.

Related posts

• No related posts.

Until recently the preferred way to test for lead poisoning was through blood serum drawn with a needle or finger sticks. Now a safer, less invasive method is available through oral fluid testing. This is a truly ouch-less test—saliva samples have been collected from children sleeping in their mother’s arms. It is 99.9% accurate, safe and easy to use with a very low cost. We could offer the Oral Lead Test Kits online at Check4Lead store if our clients want it. We have created a survey for our members, including you and would like to invite you to fill it out. It won’t take more than a minute and you answers product offering and services to you.

CLINICAL TRIALS

The clinical trial was designed and correlated by Dr. Anil T. Mangia, Chair of the Material and Child Health Section Georgia Public Health Association. “The success of this study is a milestone for lead testing on a universal scale,” said Dr. Mangia. “Children living in inner cities are at higher risk of being exposed to lead due to older homes. Also, unlike blood samples which need to be refrigerated, oral fluid swabs do not need refrigerated storage. This is a major benefit when marketed to third world countries.” Click here to learn more.

ANYONE CAN BE A VICTIM

Renovation workers and their families are potentially exposed to lead from work on pre-1978 buildings. But lead paint is not the only problem. Recently I talked to a lady who was undergoing Chelation Therapy for lead poisoning. The source was quite a surprise – she was lead-poisoned by the lead in a spice imported from outside the U.S. For a more complete list see Medline Plus.

SYMPTOMS

Common symptoms of lead poisoning are loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, constipation, difficulty sleeping, fatigue, moodiness, headache, joint or muscle aches, anemia, and decreased sexual drive. Severe health effects include damage to the nervous system, convulsion, or seizures. Lead poisoning in children can severely affect mental and physical development, and can cause a plethora of behavioral problems. Very high levels of lead in the bloodstream can be fatal for people of any age.

HERE ARE THEW RESULTS OF THE SURVEY

2. Have you heard of anyone that maybe suffering from the symptoms of lead poisoning?

3. Should the Check4Lead online store make the Oral Fluid Lead Poisoning Test Kit available for its clients?

Related posts

• No related posts.

Where Did The Idea Come From?

Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) put sec. 450 in the house appropriations bill H.R. 2584, page 144 that prohibits funds allocated by this bill from being used for enforcement of any part of the RRP Rule until the Administrator of the EPA meets its obligations under the statute.

Is the EPA Still Enforcing the RRP Rule?

Release Date: 08/31/2011: Washington University in St. Louis, Mo., to Pay Civil Penalty and Replace Windows for Failure to Disclose Lead-Based Paint Hazards

Are The EPA Recognized Lead Paint Test Kits Still Valid?

Yes, the recognition of such kits will last until EPA publicizes its recognition of the first test kit that meets both the negative response and positive response criteria outlined in the 2008 Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) rule.

Is The Rehberg Addendum Now The Law?

No, this is only a budget proposal and must be approved by the House of Representatives, the Senate, and signed into law by the President of the United States.

Will The White House Approve Rep. Rehgerg’s Addendum?

No, the White House Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 2584, cutting appropriations for the Department of Interior, environment, and related agencies… (Click here for Statement of Administrative Policy) keyword search ‘Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’.

What Happens If I Wait For Clarification Before I Comply With The RRP Rule?

Professional renovators must continue to follow the RRP Rules and be prepared for enforcement action by the EPA. he EPA can request your RRP Documentation for review even though they did not visit your office. They can also compare documentation with renovation permits on file for compliance.

Related posts

• No related posts.

An amendment was introduced by Representative Denny Rehberg (R-MT) to deny funding for enforcement of the EPA’s RRP rule until a reliable test kit is recognized by the EPA. (Rep. Rehberg’s position is that the currently available test kits do not meet the standards that the EPA established three years ago.) On July 13, 2011, the House Appropriations Committee approved the amendment as part of the 2012 budget for the Department of Interior and the EPA.

Bill H. R. 2584 Sect. 450 page 144 states that none of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement or enforce regulations commonly known as the “Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Paint Rule” or any subsequent amendments to such regulations, until the Administrator of the EPA meets its obligations under the statute.

From the Executive Office of the President

The White House Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 2584, cutting appropriations for the Department of Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. This [bill] would undermine efforts to protect sensitive populations from exposure to lead, a known toxin to children and developing fetuses, during home renovation projects. The currently available test kits allow renovators to comply with the 2008 rule. (Click here for Statement of Administrative Policy)

It Takes Three to Tango

The bill must be passed by the House and the Senate and then approved by the President. It looks like the bill will not become law in its present form. So, to use a page out of Shawn McCadden’s website,don’t be misled by the vote to cut off RRP enforcement funding. As a Renovator, do not assume that you no longer need to comply with RRPrules.

Renovators are required to keep all documentation and make it available for an EPA audit for 3 years. EPA auditors do not have to visit your office – they can require you to send all your documentation to them. So even if enforcement were to be temporarily suspended, the EPA can later ask you for records of projects that occurred during this “non-enforced” period.

Special 10% Discount Coupon Good Until September 6, 2011

We are truly sorry for the loss of life caused by Hurricane Irene. Being from Florida, we regret all the destruction of property and empathize with the hard work required to clean up after a hurricane.

Use the Coupon Code 

Irene

for a 10% discount

Related posts

• No related posts.

1. Dust wipe testing and clearance requirements are not required. The clearance verification process taught in the RRP course stays.

2. Exterior work; Vertical containment must be used when affected surfaces are within 10 feet of the property line. The containment can be set up as close as possible to the disturbed surface so long as all debris are contained in the work area. For example vertical containment can be set up 5 feet from the disturbed surface.

Interior work; Vertical containment from floor to ceiling. Certified Renovators do not have to place the minimum 6 feet of plastic on interior floors. The vertical containment can be set up as close as possible to the disturbed surface so long as all debris are contained in the work area. For example vertical containment can be set up 3 feet from the disturbed surface.

3. Certified Renovators are allowed to collect a paint chip sample and send it to a recognized laboratory for analysis in lieu of using a test kit.

4. Records to be kept on file for five years instead of the former three year requirement.

5. Minimum penalty for states and Tribal programs of $5,000.

6. Hepa vacuums EPA has decided to promulgate the requirement that HEPA vacuums be operated in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions, but not the requirement that compliant vacuums be rated at a MERV value of 17 or higher.

Many thinks to Mark Paskell of The Contractor Coaching Partnership for a quick summary of the RRP Prepublication version of the final rule.

Related posts

• No related posts.

This coupon will expire within 24 Hours.

EPA RECOMMENDED

In minutes, the D-Lead® Paint Test Kit quickly and simply determines if a paint
sample contains less than the USEPA regulated lead limit (1.0 mg/cm2). This is
the only test for lead in paint that is both Environmental Technology Verification
Program Tested and EPA Recognized* for use on drywall, plaster, wood and
ferrous metal surfaces.

D-LEAD DOES IT ALL

Be consistent, use one product for your entire lead paint test requirements.
Everything you need comes with each test kit. For a limited time, we are offering a
5% discount on D-Lead Paint Test Kits and free shipping for purchases that total
more than $250.

Use the coupon Code PETM0P2R9 for 5% off at checkout when you buy a D-Lead Paint Test Kit.

This coupon will expire on Friday June 24th, 2011;

Art

Related posts

• No related posts.

When a lead-safe certified contractor drives by a pre-1978 project that he bid on and sees  the work being done by non-certified renovator, just how is he supposed to feel? He is obeying the law and doing business in safe manner, yet he is losing income needed to pay his employees and support his family to the renegade renovator.

A contractor in Maine shot a video of a non-compliant renovator sanding the side of an apartment complex without containment, PPE, or any safety precautions.  Then he posted the video on YouTube. Although it took several months, the non-compliant renovator was eventually cited and fined by the EPA.

CONCLUSION

The EPA admits that without people bringing RRP violations to their attention their enforcement efforts are diminished. They are hoping that the majority of contractors have a willingness to report misconduct by non-compliant renovators. When compliant contractors have their livelihood jeopardized by what amounts to criminal activity, reporting RRP violations is not vicarious snitching but only good corporate citizenship.

Related posts

• No related posts.

An expert source was kind enough to point out some corrections to our original news letter titled RRP Clearance Testing: Proposed Changes to the RRP Rule. The purpose for writing this piece was to make you aware of possible changes that will require clearance and clearance testing requirements for EPA’s Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program. Corrections and additional information are as  follows:

1. The Settlement Agreement does not mention a requirement that clearance testing be done by a third party; however, the risk of it going that way is possible.
2. In addition, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40: Protection of Environment Part 745 already has provisions to substitute dust clearance sampling in lieu of cleaning verification and it does not require third party technician.

Conclusion:

Please note that a dust sampling technician certification is an 8 hour class available from the same trainer that did your certified renovator training. If there are addition changes to the RRP Rule, let’s hope the renovator can do the dust sampling.

As always, I get by with a little help from my friends-many thanks for their comments.

Related posts

• RRP Clearance Testing: Proposed Changes to the RRP Rule (0)

In 2008, the Sierra Club filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for the 9^th Circuit for Review of the EPA’s LRRP Rule-other entities joined in the litigation (click here to see the Settlement Agreement)    In accordance with the settlement, The EPA agreed to address what was defined in the “Settlement Agreement” as short comings prior to the RRP rule effective April 22, 2010. One of the items is called the “Clearance Proposal” in paragraph 7 of the “Settlement Agreement”. In paragraph 7.b the EPA agreed to take the final action on the “Clearance Proposal” on or before July 15, 2011. Under some constraints, Paragraph 7.c allows the EPA to extend the deadline in Paragraph 7.b by up to four months.

This could require dust wipe sampling and lab test verification on un-carpeted floors, windowsills, and window troughs in the work area after the follow types of renovation:

• o Use of a heat gun at temperatures below 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.
• o Removal or replacement of window or door frames.
• o Scraping 60 square feet or more of painted surfaces.
• o Removing more than 40 square feet of trim, molding, cabinets, or other fixtures.
• o Removal of more than 6 square feet of plaster and lathe building component.

The EPA estimates it could add $160.00 per room for the testing cost for a project. Your cost could skyrocket if you have to pay a certified lead dust sampler every time you replace a door jamb or 40 feet of trim.

CONCLUSION

Who paid the legal fees for the attorneys that litigated the “Settlement Agreement” against the United States Environmental Protection Agency? If we, the taxpayer, footed the bill, how much much did it cost us?  Sorry, only a question.

Has the Sierra Club conducted studies to determine that cleaning verifications are not accurate? I have not seen a single study that indicates this “Clearance Testing” rule is needed-we need more information. I think they just assumed that we need yet another rule to keep us honest. In my opinion, it is simple enough to use the existing 8 hour training program already in place for a “Clearance Testing” Certification. I think contractors will follow the RRP procedures because it is part of their ethic as well as to reduce their legal exposure and possible EPA fines.

EPA could simply refine the existing RRP Procedure for final clean-up verification. Currently you use a test wipe on the effected surfaces and compare it to a cleaning verification card. If it does not pass, the surfaces are cleaned as many times as necessary to get the desired result. If this process is inadequate, find one that will work-like maybe using statically charged wipes that change color when exposed to lead. Adding an amendment that will require third party testing will add another expense to the cost of compliance. In addition, are there enough laboratories to handle the additional clearance tests in a timely manner?

Then there is the law of unintended consequences. The objective of the RRP Rule is to reduce lead poisoning exposure for children and adults. The EPA could add so many regulations that more property owners will find a way around the rules. They may do the job (incorrectly) themselves, or hire contractors who are not RRP-certified. Consequently, we may have less compliance rather that more.

P.S., Oh, buy the way, we are renovators and not in the lead abatement business. I think the water can get a little muddy here.

ABT

Related posts

• Shawn Mccadden and RRP (0)
• RRP Legal Opinion Letter (0)
• RRP Clearance Testing: Corrections (0)
• EPA eliminates the so-called opt-out provision of RRP (0)